Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Department of Defense political appointments : positions and process / Cheryl Y. Marcum ... [et al.].

Contributor(s): Publisher: Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2001Description: xix, 80 pages ; 28 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • online resource
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 083302986X
Subject(s): Genre/Form: LOC classification:
  • UA23.6 .D48 2001
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Also available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.
Contents:
Introduction -- Trends in DoD Political Appointees -- The Appointment Process and Rules Governing Political Appointees -- Conclusion -- Appendix A: An Overview of the Federal Workforce System -- Appendix B: DoD PAS Position Data Sources -- Appendix C: PAS Position Titles in OSD from 1947 to 1999 -- Appendix D: Chronology of PAS Positions Assigned to OSD Functional Areas -- Appendix E: Authorized OSD PAS Positions by Function (May 31, 1999).
Summary: In 1998, the Defense Science Board Task Force on Human Resources Strategy was established for the purpose of evaluating the Department of Defense's (DoD's) capacity to attract and retain both civilian and military personnel. As part of this evaluation, RAND was asked to study the growth of political appointment positions within the DoD as well as to examine the appointment and confirmation process that potential political appointees face. Tasked with reviewing relevant DoD data, the National Defense Research Institute (NDRI), acting in support of the Defense Science Board Task Force, found that the number of DoD positions requiring Senate confirmation has grown significantly over the past two decades. The study also revealed that the functional responsibilities of such positions have narrowed while their vacancy rates have increased. In assessing the literature, the NDRI found that disincentives exist in the political appointment and confirmation process -- namely, requirements that candidates disclose a range of personal and financial information; requirements to comply with conflict-of-interest regulations that may require divestiture of stock holdings; and requirements to comply with extensive post-employment restrictions. Additionally, the length of the appointment and confirmation process itself may serve as a disincentive to potential appointees.
Item type: eBooks
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

"National Defense Research Institute."

Includes bibliographical references (p. 73-80).

Introduction -- Trends in DoD Political Appointees -- The Appointment Process and Rules Governing Political Appointees -- Conclusion -- Appendix A: An Overview of the Federal Workforce System -- Appendix B: DoD PAS Position Data Sources -- Appendix C: PAS Position Titles in OSD from 1947 to 1999 -- Appendix D: Chronology of PAS Positions Assigned to OSD Functional Areas -- Appendix E: Authorized OSD PAS Positions by Function (May 31, 1999).

In 1998, the Defense Science Board Task Force on Human Resources Strategy was established for the purpose of evaluating the Department of Defense's (DoD's) capacity to attract and retain both civilian and military personnel. As part of this evaluation, RAND was asked to study the growth of political appointment positions within the DoD as well as to examine the appointment and confirmation process that potential political appointees face. Tasked with reviewing relevant DoD data, the National Defense Research Institute (NDRI), acting in support of the Defense Science Board Task Force, found that the number of DoD positions requiring Senate confirmation has grown significantly over the past two decades. The study also revealed that the functional responsibilities of such positions have narrowed while their vacancy rates have increased. In assessing the literature, the NDRI found that disincentives exist in the political appointment and confirmation process -- namely, requirements that candidates disclose a range of personal and financial information; requirements to comply with conflict-of-interest regulations that may require divestiture of stock holdings; and requirements to comply with extensive post-employment restrictions. Additionally, the length of the appointment and confirmation process itself may serve as a disincentive to potential appointees.

Also available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.

Copyright © 2020 Alfaisal University Library. All Rights Reserved.
Tel: +966 11 2158948 Fax: +966 11 2157910 Email:
librarian@alfaisal.edu