U.S. and Russian policymaking with respect to the use of force / edited by Jeremy R. Azrael and Emil A. Payin.
Series: Conference proceedings (Rand Corporation) ; 129.Publisher: Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 1996Description: viii, 217 pages ; 28 cmContent type:- text
- computer
- unmediated
- online resource
- volume
- 083302468X
- Combined operations (Military science) -- Decision making
- Intervention (International law) -- Decision making -- Case studies
- Russia (Federation) -- History, Military -- 20th century -- Case studies
- Russia (Federation) -- Military policy -- Case studies
- United States -- History, Military -- 20th century -- Case studies
- United States -- Military policy -- Case studies
- JX4481 .U8 1996
- Also available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.

"RAND Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies -- Center for Ethnopolitical and Regional Research."
Conference held September 27-28, 1995.
Includes bibliographical references.
Introduction -- Section One: Russian Cases -- Ossetia-Ingushetia / Alan Ch. Kasaev -- Chechnya / Emil A. Payin and Arkady A. Popov -- Tadjikistan / Arkady Yu. Dubnov -- Trans-Dniestria / Irina F. Selivanova -- Georgia-Abkhazia / Evgeny M. Kozhokin -- Section Two: U.S. Cases -- Lebanon: 1982-1984 / John H. Kelly -- Africa In the 1990s / Walter H. Kansteiner -- The Caribbean Basin / Robert A. Pastor -- Panama and Haiti / Richard L. Millet -- Intervention Decisionmaking in the Bush Administration / Arnold Kanter -- Yugoslavia: 1989-1996 / Warren Zimmermann -- Conclusion: Russian and American Intervention Policy in Comparative Perspective / Jeremy R. Azrael, Benjamin S. Lambeth, Emil A. Payin, and Arkady A. Popov.
This volume presents case studies of U.S. and Russian peacekeeping and peacemaking operations since the end of the Cold War. The chapters are authored by U.S. and Russian policymakers and/or policy analysts who were neither direct participants in, nor first-hand observers of, the events they describe. Drawing on the evidence presented in the case studies, a concluding chapter compares the political and institutional arrangements and procedures through which the two countries decide whether or not to engage in peacekeeping and peacemaking operations and assesses the implications of the key similarities and differences for combined operations in the future.
Also available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.
Description based on print version record.