The book of why : the new science of cause and effect / Judea Pearl and Dana Mackenzie.
By: Pearl, Judea [author.].
Contributor(s): Mackenzie, Dana [author.].
Publisher: New York : Basic Books, ©2018Copyright date: ©2018Edition: First edition.Description: 418 pages ; 25 cm.Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: 9780465097609.Subject(s): Causation | InferenceGenre/Form: Print books.Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
On Shelf | Q175.32 .C38 P43 2018 (Browse shelf) | Available | AU00000000013914 |
Browsing Alfaisal University Shelves , Shelving location: On Shelf Close shelf browser
Q175 .S5734 2010 An introduction to science and technology studies / | Q175 .S5734 2010 An introduction to science and technology studies / | Q175.32.A47 G59 2013 Elegance in science : the beauty of simplicity / | Q175.32 .C38 P43 2018 The book of why : the new science of cause and effect / | Q175.32.C65 J64 2009 Simply complexity : a clear guide to complexity theory / | Q175.32.K45 Y36 2013 The outer limits of reason what science, mathematics, and logic cannot tell us / | Q175.32.M38 P73 2011 Mathematical modeling for the scientific method / |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
The ladder of causation -- From buccaneers to guinea pigs: the genesis of causal inference -- From evidence to causes: Reverend Bayes meets Mr. Holmes -- Confounding and deconfounding: or, slaying the lurking variable -- The smoke-filled debate: clearing the air -- Paradoxes galore! -- Beyond adjustment: the conquest of Mt. Intervention -- Counterfactuals: mining worlds that could have been -- Mediation: the search for a mechanism -- Big data, artificial intelligence, and the big questions.
"Everyone has heard the claim, "Correlation does not imply causation." What might sound like a reasonable dictum metastasized in the twentieth century into one of science's biggest obstacles, as a legion of researchers became unwilling to make the claim that one thing could cause another. Even two decades ago, asking a statistician a question like "Was it the aspirin that stopped my headache?" would have been like asking if he believed in voodoo, or at best a topic for conversation at a cocktail party rather than a legitimate target of scientific inquiry. Scientists were allowed to posit only that the probability that one thing was associated with another. This all changed with Judea Pearl, whose work on causality was not just a victory for common sense, but a revolution in the study of the world"--