Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Base realignment and closure (BRAC) and organizational restructuring in the DOD : implications for education and training infrastructure / Dina G. Levy ... [et al.].

Contributor(s): Publisher: Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2004Description: xxiii, 99 pages : illustrations ; 23 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • online resource
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 0833035576 (pbk. : alk. paper)
Other title:
  • BRAC and organizational restructuring in the DoD [Running title]
  • Base realignment and closure (BRAC) and organizational restructuring in the Department of Defense
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • UA23 .B346 2004
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Also available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.
Contents:
Introduction -- Defense Information School -- Department of Defense Polygraph Institute -- Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center -- National Geospatial Intelligence College -- Lessons Learned and Recommendations -- Appendix -- Bibliography.
Summary: The Department of Defense (DoD) often improves its efficiency by consolidating facilities (mainly through base realignment and closure, or BRAC) and changing its governance structure. Subsequently, these shifts significantly affect the education, training, and development (ET&D) institutions that support DoD personnel. With an eye toward the scheduled round of BRAC in 2005, the DoD Office of the Chancellor of Education and Professional Development asked the RAND Corporation to review specific ways in which past initiatives have affected ET&D establishments. RAND researchers focused on four cases from the 1990s-two institutions that experienced significant infrastructure change (i.e., through physical relocation) and two that did not. Based on the lessons learned from the case studies, they make recommendations for decisionmakers to consider when moving an institution, remaining at a location, constructing a new facility, or consolidating institutions. The researchers also look at the strategies used by the institutions and their stakeholders to influence decisions about infrastructure change, focusing on clarifying roles and improving the ET&D system as a whole.
Item type:
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

"National Defense Research Institute."

Includes bibliographical references (p. 97-99).

Introduction -- Defense Information School -- Department of Defense Polygraph Institute -- Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center -- National Geospatial Intelligence College -- Lessons Learned and Recommendations -- Appendix -- Bibliography.

The Department of Defense (DoD) often improves its efficiency by consolidating facilities (mainly through base realignment and closure, or BRAC) and changing its governance structure. Subsequently, these shifts significantly affect the education, training, and development (ET&D) institutions that support DoD personnel. With an eye toward the scheduled round of BRAC in 2005, the DoD Office of the Chancellor of Education and Professional Development asked the RAND Corporation to review specific ways in which past initiatives have affected ET&D establishments. RAND researchers focused on four cases from the 1990s-two institutions that experienced significant infrastructure change (i.e., through physical relocation) and two that did not. Based on the lessons learned from the case studies, they make recommendations for decisionmakers to consider when moving an institution, remaining at a location, constructing a new facility, or consolidating institutions. The researchers also look at the strategies used by the institutions and their stakeholders to influence decisions about infrastructure change, focusing on clarifying roles and improving the ET&D system as a whole.

Also available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.

Copyright © 2020 Alfaisal University Library. All Rights Reserved.
Tel: +966 11 2158948 Fax: +966 11 2157910 Email:
librarian@alfaisal.edu