Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Contingency plans for war in Western Europe, 1920-1940 / Mark Jacobsen, Robert Levine, William Schwabe.

By: Contributor(s): Publisher: Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 1985Description: xxi, 190 pages : illustrations, maps ; 23 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • online resource
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 0833006614 (pbk.)
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • UA646 .J24 1985
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Also available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.
Summary: In an attempt to determine the effects of war planning on the behavior of countries in crises and wars, this report analyzes the national-level planning that preceded and shaped the German invasion of the Low Countries and northern France in 1940. As a study of war planning in the 1930s by France, Britain, Belgium, and Germany, it sheds considerable light on the way in which political, financial, and manpower constraints guide the military planning process: Threat assessment played a comparatively minor part in planning. Instead, available resources were the single most important determinant of plans. The situation of a totalitarian nation bent on changing the European status quo opposed by a coalition of democracies offers obvious analogies with present-day NATO. The authors discuss the similarities and differences in the historical and current situations, and draw three types of parallels: conceptual parallels, planning process comparisons, and direct similarities.
Item type:
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

"A report from the RAND Strategy Assessment Center."

"June 1985."

Includes bibliographical references (p. 188-190).

In an attempt to determine the effects of war planning on the behavior of countries in crises and wars, this report analyzes the national-level planning that preceded and shaped the German invasion of the Low Countries and northern France in 1940. As a study of war planning in the 1930s by France, Britain, Belgium, and Germany, it sheds considerable light on the way in which political, financial, and manpower constraints guide the military planning process: Threat assessment played a comparatively minor part in planning. Instead, available resources were the single most important determinant of plans. The situation of a totalitarian nation bent on changing the European status quo opposed by a coalition of democracies offers obvious analogies with present-day NATO. The authors discuss the similarities and differences in the historical and current situations, and draw three types of parallels: conceptual parallels, planning process comparisons, and direct similarities.

Also available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.

Description based on print version record.

Copyright © 2020 Alfaisal University Library. All Rights Reserved.
Tel: +966 11 2158948 Fax: +966 11 2157910 Email:
librarian@alfaisal.edu