Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Uniform deterrence of nuclear first use / Robert A. Levine.

By: Contributor(s): Publisher: Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 1993Description: xiii, 73 pages ; 23 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • online resource
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 0833014013
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • U264 .L49 1993
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Also available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.
Summary: This report proposes initial discussion of a United States-led international policy of Uniform Deterrence of Nuclear First Use (UD). The purpose of such a policy would be to preserve the "firebreak" between nuclear and all other types of weapons, which since 1945 has been the key to preventing nuclear combat. The report analyzes both the role of UD in achieving its primary objective of deterring first use, and implementation of punishment for first use (preferably non-nuclear punishment) if deterrence fails. The discussion stresses the distinction between the deterrence of the use of nuclear weapons, which is the purpose of UD, and policies to discourage proliferation of the possession of nuclear weapons; but it contends that UD and anti-proliferation efforts should be complementary. The primary conclusion is that although implementation after a failure of deterrence would be difficult, it would not be impossible, and that UD can materially decrease the likelihood of first use in many cases. An open question is its acceptability, internationally and within the United States, which is why this report is an opening of discussion, not a closure.
Item type:
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

"Project on Avoiding Nuclear War: Managing Conflict in the Nuclear Age."

"RAND/UCLA Center for Soviet Studies."

Includes bibliographical references.

This report proposes initial discussion of a United States-led international policy of Uniform Deterrence of Nuclear First Use (UD). The purpose of such a policy would be to preserve the "firebreak" between nuclear and all other types of weapons, which since 1945 has been the key to preventing nuclear combat. The report analyzes both the role of UD in achieving its primary objective of deterring first use, and implementation of punishment for first use (preferably non-nuclear punishment) if deterrence fails. The discussion stresses the distinction between the deterrence of the use of nuclear weapons, which is the purpose of UD, and policies to discourage proliferation of the possession of nuclear weapons; but it contends that UD and anti-proliferation efforts should be complementary. The primary conclusion is that although implementation after a failure of deterrence would be difficult, it would not be impossible, and that UD can materially decrease the likelihood of first use in many cases. An open question is its acceptability, internationally and within the United States, which is why this report is an opening of discussion, not a closure.

Also available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.

Description based on print version record.

Copyright © 2020 Alfaisal University Library. All Rights Reserved.
Tel: +966 11 2158948 Fax: +966 11 2157910 Email:
librarian@alfaisal.edu