Euthanasia and the ethics of a doctor's decisions : an argument against assisted dying / Ole Hartling ; translated by Tim Davies.
By: Hartling, Ole Johannes [author.].
Publisher: New York, NY : Bloomsbury Academic, ©2021Description: 197 p.Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: 9781350186224; 9781350186217.Subject(s): Euthanasia -- Moral and ethical aspectsGenre/Form: Print books.Summary: "Why do so many doctors have profound misgivings about the push to legalise euthanasia and assisted suicide? Ole Hartling uses his background as a physician, university professor and former president of the Danish Council of Ethics to introduce new elements into what can often be understood as an all too simple debate. Alive to the case that assisted dying can be driven by an unattainable yearning for control, Hartling concentrates on two fundamental questions: whether the answer to suffering is to remove the sufferer, and whether self-determination in dying and death is an illusion. He draws on his own experience as a medical doctor to personalize the ethical arguments, share patients' narratives and make references to medical literature. Here is a sceptical stance towards euthanasia, one that is respectful to those who hold different opinions and well-informed about the details and nuances of different euthanasia practices. Written from a Scandinavian perspective, where respect for autonomy and high quality palliative care go hand in hand, Hartling's is a nuanced, valuable contribution to the arguments that surround a question doctors have faced since the birth of medicine. He shows us how the intentions of doing something good can sometimes lead to even greater dilemmas, opening us up to those situations where an inclination to end suffering by ending life is deeply conflicting both for the clinician and for any fellow human being"--Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
On Shelf | R726 .H378 2021 (Browse shelf) | Available | AU00000000017832 |
Browsing Alfaisal University Shelves , Shelving location: On Shelf Close shelf browser
R726 .C6345 2019 A dignified ending : taking control over how we die / | R726 .C6725 2013 Continuous sedation at the end of life : ethical, clinical, and legal perspectives / | R726 .E97 2017 Euthanasia and assisted suicide : global views on choosing to end life / | R726 .H378 2021 Euthanasia and the ethics of a doctor's decisions : an argument against assisted dying / | R726 .H828 2018 Human dignity and assisted death / | R726 .L4313 2014 Honoring life : medical ethics and physician-assisted suicide | R726 .M238 2018 Ethics in palliative care : a comlete guide / |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
"Why do so many doctors have profound misgivings about the push to legalise euthanasia and assisted suicide? Ole Hartling uses his background as a physician, university professor and former president of the Danish Council of Ethics to introduce new elements into what can often be understood as an all too simple debate. Alive to the case that assisted dying can be driven by an unattainable yearning for control, Hartling concentrates on two fundamental questions: whether the answer to suffering is to remove the sufferer, and whether self-determination in dying and death is an illusion. He draws on his own experience as a medical doctor to personalize the ethical arguments, share patients' narratives and make references to medical literature. Here is a sceptical stance towards euthanasia, one that is respectful to those who hold different opinions and well-informed about the details and nuances of different euthanasia practices. Written from a Scandinavian perspective, where respect for autonomy and high quality palliative care go hand in hand, Hartling's is a nuanced, valuable contribution to the arguments that surround a question doctors have faced since the birth of medicine. He shows us how the intentions of doing something good can sometimes lead to even greater dilemmas, opening us up to those situations where an inclination to end suffering by ending life is deeply conflicting both for the clinician and for any fellow human being"--