Six faces of globalization : who wins, who loses, and why it matters / Anthea Roberts and Nicolas Lamp.
By: Roberts, Anthea (Writer on international law) [author.].
Contributor(s): Lamp, Nicolas [author.].
Publisher: Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, ©2021Description: vii, 391 pages : illustrations ; 24 cm.Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: 9780674293908.Subject(s): Globalization | Anti-globalization movementGenre/Form: Print books.Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
On Shelf | JZ1318 .R6245 2021 (Browse shelf) | Available | AU00000000020077 |
Browsing Alfaisal University Shelves , Shelving location: On Shelf Close shelf browser
JZ1314 .L36 2022 Military alliances in the twenty-first century / | JZ1318 .D38 2023 Discriminatory clubs : the geopolitics of international organizations / | JZ1318 .G55662 2006 How to spend $50 billion to make the world a better place / | JZ1318 .R6245 2021 Six faces of globalization : who wins, who loses, and why it matters / | JZ1318 .S595 2018 Globalists : the end of empire and the birth of neoliberalism / | JZ1318 .S765 2022 International studies : global forces, interactions, and tensions / | JZ1329.5 .H33 2020 The world : a brief introduction / |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Why narratives matter -- The establishment narrative -- The left-wing populist narrative -- The right-wing populist narrative -- The corporate power narrative -- The geoeconomic narrative -- The global threats narrative -- Switching narratives -- Overlaps among narratives -- Trade-offs among narratives -- Blind spots and biases -- Kaleidoscopic complexity -- Potential alliances.
"Does globalization help everyone or just the rich? Is it the enemy of sustainability or the only hope against climate change? Rival camps are dug in, but Anthea Roberts and Nicolas Lamp find points of agreement. Isolating the value conflicts that drive the globalization debate, they show where consensus lies and argue for achievable policy change"--