<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02588cam a2200421 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">rnd000000000112003</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">RAND</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200811100818.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">931020s1993    caua          000 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">   93042322</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0833014781</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="027" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">RAND/MR-364/1-LE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">(Sirsi) a348285</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">$6.50</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CstmoR</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">CstmoR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">n-us-ca</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">LB2828.85.C2</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">E34 1993</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">The effects of the California voucher initiative on public expenditures for education :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">executive summary /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Michael A. Shires ... [et al.].</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">Santa Monica, CA :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">RAND,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">1993.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">iii, 7 pages :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">illustrations ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">28 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">txt</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">computer</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">c</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">n</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">online resource</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">cr</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">nc</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">"Institute on Education and Training."</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This report is an executive summary of RAND/MR-364-LE, which summarizes the findings of an analysis of the fiscal effects of Proposition 174, a school-voucher initiative that appeared on the California November 1993 ballot. Although the proposition was defeated, school voucher plans are under discussion in several other states and may be revisited in California. Hence, the results of this analysis may be relevant to future policy debates in California and elsewhere. The authors found that the fiscal effects of the initiative were highly uncertain. If Proposition 174 had passed, the state, the courts, parents, and private schools would have been confronted with choices. Their responses to these choices would have determined the initiative's fiscal effects. Furthermore, the range of possible choices would have produced a wide range of outcomes. The report also found that, absent any changes in the rules instituted through Propositions 98 and 111, the state faces a significant fiscal crisis as mandated K-12 expenditures rise to 43 percent of General Fund revenues in 2002-2003.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Also available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Education</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">California</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Finance.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Educational vouchers</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">California.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Shires, M.</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Krop, Cathy S.</subfield>
    <subfield code="q">(Cathy Sloan),</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">1966-</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Rydell, C. Peter.</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Carroll, Stephen J.,</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">1940-</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Rand Corporation.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Rand Institute on Education &amp; Training.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Lilly Endowment.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1">
    <subfield code="y">Online Access</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR364.1/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">597812</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">597812</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
