<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03666cam a2200433 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">314541243</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">RAND</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200811100820.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">100621s2013    caua     b    000 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0833081659 (pbk. : alk. paper)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9780833081650 (pbk. : alk. paper)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="027" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">RAND/RR-397-AF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">$18.95</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">paperback</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CstmoR</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">CstmoR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">UG1242.F5</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">D74 2013</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Drew, John G.,</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">1956-</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Enabling early sustainment decisions :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">application to F-35 depot-level maintenance /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">John G. Drew, Ronald G. McGarvey, Peter Buryk.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">Santa Monica, CA :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">RAND,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2013.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xv, 27 pages :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">color illustrations ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">28 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">txt</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">n</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">nc</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">"RAND Project Air Force."</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (p. 25-27).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Introduction -- TCA and Current Air Force Sustainment Efforts -- Application of the Framework to the F-35 -- Conclusions and Potential Extensions of This Analysis.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Also available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The U.S. Air Force has long struggled to incorporate new weapon system logistics requirements and support system design considerations into its broader sustainment enterprise early in the acquisition process. To help inform Air Force decisionmaking with regard to sustainment sourcing, RAND Project AIR FORCE researchers explored and adapted lessons from the transaction cost accounting literature. The result is a powerful economic-based framework that has three primary benefits when it comes to addressing sustainment planning challenges: It is a repeatable, analytically driven decision tool that does not require large amounts of data; it considers repair source decisionmaking in the context of the broader Air Force enterprise; and it is potentially applicable to other aspects of sustainment planning, such as managing government-mandated repair sourcing mixes and informing other Air Force sustainment community responsibilities. This report demonstrates how the framework can be used to select among depot maintenance strategies by applying it to the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the largest acquisition program in U.S. Department of Defense history. Although the U.S. government will retain the capability to perform the range of depot-level repairs for the F-35, 40 percent of the workload&#x2014;known as &#x201C;above core&#x201D;&#x2014;can be considered for sourcing to an organic Air Force facility, another military service&#x2019;s facility, a foreign partner, or the private sector. The framework helps planners visualize program data and compare new acquisition programs with legacy Air Force systems. In this way, it offers the Air Force additional leverage in responding to technology developments and vetting contractors&#x2019; engineering, reliability, and maintainability projections for new weapon systems.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">United States.</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Air Force</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Equipment</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Maintenance and repair.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">United States.</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Air Force</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Operational readiness.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">United States.</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Air Force</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Procurement.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">United States.</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Air Force</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Weapons systems</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Maintenance and repair.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">F-35 (Jet fighter plane)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Maintenance and repair.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">McGarvey, Ronald G.</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Buryk, Peter.</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Project Air Force (U.S.).</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Resource Management Program.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Rand Corporation.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">United States.</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Air Force.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1">
    <subfield code="y">Online Access</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR397.html</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">597849</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">597849</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
