<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <nonSort>The </nonSort>
    <title>Strategic Defense Initiative and European security</title>
    <subTitle>a conference report</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Brown, Nanette</namePart>
    <namePart type="date">1958-</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">author.</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>Rand Corporation</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>Ford Foundation</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <genre authority="marc">bibliography</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">cau</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">1986</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>xi, 33 pages ; 23 cm</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>This report summarizes the presentations and discussions of a conference on the U.S. Strategic Defense Initiative and European Security held in March 1985. The conference participants were government officials and defense analysts from the Federal Republic of Germany, France, Great Britain, and the United States. The conferees overwhelmingly supported research on the Strategic Defense Initiative as a hedge against Soviet ballistic missile defense programs. However, support for development or deployment hinged in part on whether Soviet actions were seen as being linked to U.S. actions. These views, along with the assumption that the Soviet Union would field defenses if the United States did, reflected differences in concern about the implications of strategic defenses for (1) deterrence in general, (2) NATO strategy and deterrence in Europe, (3) arms control, and (4) European technological interests.</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Nanette C. Brown.</note>
  <note>"January 1986."</note>
  <note>Includes bibliographical references.</note>
  <note>Also available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.</note>
  <subject>
    <geographicCode authority="marcgac">e------</geographicCode>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Strategic Defense Initiative</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <geographic>Europe</geographic>
    <topic>Defenses</topic>
    <topic>Congresses</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="lcc">UA646 .B658 1986</classification>
  <identifier type="isbn">0833007025</identifier>
  <identifier type="stock number"/>
  <identifier type="uri">http://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3366/</identifier>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="Online Access">http://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3366/</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">CstmoR</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">920212</recordCreationDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="RAND">rnd000000000047457</recordIdentifier>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
