<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02532cam a2200397 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">rnd000000000111367</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">RAND</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">040621s2004    cau      b    000 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">   2004004374</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0833035363 (pbk. : alk paper)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="027" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">RAND/MG-143-AF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">(Sirsi) a454083</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">$20.00</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">paperback</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CstmoR</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">CstmoR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">a-cc---</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="050" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">UA835</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">.P59 2004</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pollpeter, Kevin L.</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">U.S.-China security management :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">assessing the military-to-military relationship  /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Kevin L. Pollpeter.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">Santa Monica, CA :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">RAND,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2004.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xx, 107 pages ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">23 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">txt</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">computer</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">c</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">n</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">online resource</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">cr</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">nc</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">"Project Air Force."</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (p. 101-107).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Restrictions on military-to-military relations with China imposed in 2001 stirred a debate about the value of those activities and their place in the overall U.S.-China relationship. This report examines the debate on security cooperation between the two countries and finds that there is value in the relationship, despite its problems. The debate centers around four major issues of contention: the potential risk to U.S. national security of military relations with China, the potential benefits of the relationship to the United States, whether the United States can expect to influence China through the relationship, and the relative levels of reciprocity and transparency experienced. The study concludes that the U.S. military relationship with China should concentrate on security management rather than on security cooperation. A three-part program of dialogue, information gathering, and limited cooperation can have mutual benefit in minimizing misperceptions and the chances of conflict. Lower-level facility visits, exchanges of students, and the like are less likely to be effective.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Also available on the Internet via WWW in PDF format.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">China</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Military relations</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">United States.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">United States</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Military policy.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">United States</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Military relations</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">China.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Project Air Force (U.S.).</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Strategy and Doctrine Program.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Rand Corporation.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">United States.</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Air Force.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1">
    <subfield code="y">Online Access</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://www.rand.org/publications/MG/MG143/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">600193</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">600193</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
