Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

The Politics of Water Institutional Reform in Neopatrimonial States [electronic resource] : A Comparative Analysis of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan / by Jenniver Sehring.

By: Contributor(s): Publisher: Wiesbaden : VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2009Description: XVI, 216 p. online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9783531913773
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Printed edition:: No titleDDC classification:
  • 320 23
LOC classification:
  • JA1-92
Online resources:
Contents:
Water Governance and Water Institutional Reform -- Theoretical Framework: New Institutionalism -- Analytical framework -- Comparative Research Design -- Water Institutional Reforms in Kyrgyzstan -- Water Institutional Reforms in Tajikistan -- Comparing the Politics of Water Institutional Reform -- Conclusion.
In: Springer eBooksSummary: In many countries, water institutional reforms (like the establishment of water user associations or the introduction of pricing mechanisms) are conducted in order to achieve more sustainable, efficient, and equitable water usage. Often, however, these reforms do not meet their objectives. Based on a comparative analysis of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, this study highlights the long neglected role of politics. It shows how a neopatrimonial regime context impacts the reform process, focusing on the decision making, the agricultural sector, the local governance institutions, internal water-institutional linkages, and the role of international donor agencies.
Item type: eBooks
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Water Governance and Water Institutional Reform -- Theoretical Framework: New Institutionalism -- Analytical framework -- Comparative Research Design -- Water Institutional Reforms in Kyrgyzstan -- Water Institutional Reforms in Tajikistan -- Comparing the Politics of Water Institutional Reform -- Conclusion.

In many countries, water institutional reforms (like the establishment of water user associations or the introduction of pricing mechanisms) are conducted in order to achieve more sustainable, efficient, and equitable water usage. Often, however, these reforms do not meet their objectives. Based on a comparative analysis of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, this study highlights the long neglected role of politics. It shows how a neopatrimonial regime context impacts the reform process, focusing on the decision making, the agricultural sector, the local governance institutions, internal water-institutional linkages, and the role of international donor agencies.

Copyright © 2020 Alfaisal University Library. All Rights Reserved.
Tel: +966 11 2158948 Fax: +966 11 2157910 Email:
librarian@alfaisal.edu