000			04254nam a22005175i 4500
001			978-1-4614-6639-0
003			DE-He213
005			20160615101622.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			150609s2015 xxu| s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9781461466390 _9978-1-4614-6639-0
024	7		_a10.1007/978-1-4614-6639-0 _2doi
049			_aAlfaisal Main Library
050		4	_aHV6001-7220.5
072		7	_aJKV _2bicssc
072		7	_aSOC004000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a364 _223
100	1		_aFichtelberg, Aaron. _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aHybrid Tribunals _h[electronic resource] : _bA Comparative Examination / _cby Aaron Fichtelberg.
264		1	_aNew York, NY : _bSpringer New York : _bImprint: Springer, _c2015.
300			_aXVIII, 206 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	1		_aSpringer Series on International Justice and Human Rights
505	0		_aIntroduction: Hybrid Tribunals in International Justice -- I: Forming the Hybrid Tribunals -- Sierra Leone: Civil War and Justice -- Kosovo: International and Hybrid Justice -- Cambodia: Justice (long) After the Fact -- East Timor: Genocide and Colonialism -- Lebanon: Assassination of Rafic Hariri and Global Justice -- II: Structuring the Tribunals -- Sierra Leone -- Kosovo -- Cambodia -- East Timor -- Lebanon -- III: The Tribunals in Action -- Sierra Leone: Taylor and “The Other” -- Cambodia and Lebanon: Fighting for Independence -- Kosovo and East Timor: Working in the UN System -- IV: Conclusions: Evaluating the Tribunals -- Hybrid Tribunals and Local Justice -- Hybrid Tribunals and International Justice Revisited -- Guidelines for Future Tribunals.
520			_aThis book examines hybrid tribunals created in Sierra Leone, Kosovo, Cambodia, East Timor, and Lebanon, in terms of their origins (the political and social forces that led to their creation), the legal regimes that they used, their various institutional structures, and the challenges that they faced during their operations. Through this study, the author looks at both their successes and their shortcomings, and presents recommendations for the formation of future hybrid tribunals.   Hybrid tribunals are a form of the international justice where the judicial responsibility is shared between the international community and the local state where they function. These tribunals represent an important bridge between traditional international courts like the International Criminal Court (ICC), the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and various local justice systems. Because hybrid tribunals are developed in response to large-scale atrocities, these courts are properly considered part of the international criminal justice system. This feature gives hybrid tribunals the accountability and legitimacy often lost in local justice systems; however, by including regional courtroom procedures and personnel, they are integrated into the local justice system in a way that allows a society to deal with its criminals on its own terms, at least in part.   This unique volume combines historical and legal analyses of these hybrid tribunals, placing them within a larger historical, political, and legal context. It will be of interest to researchers in Criminal Justice, International Studies, International Law, and related fields. .
650		0	_aSocial sciences.
650		0	_aPolitical science.
650		0	_aInternational criminal law.
650		0	_aCriminology.
650	1	4	_aSocial Sciences.
650	2	4	_aCriminology & Criminal Justice.
650	2	4	_aInternational Criminal Law.
650	2	4	_aPolitical Science.
655		7	_aElectronic books. _2local
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9781461466383
830		0	_aSpringer Series on International Justice and Human Rights
856	4	0	_uhttp://ezproxy.alfaisal.edu/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6639-0
912			_aZDB-2-BHS
942			_2lcc _cEBOOKS
999			_c261642 _d261642