| 000 | 02738nam a22004458i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CR9781107053762 | ||
| 003 | UkCbUP | ||
| 005 | 20161016095642.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr|||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 130328s2014||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d | ||
| 020 | _a9781107053762 (ebook) | ||
| 020 | _z9781107045491 (hardback) | ||
| 020 | _z9781107623583 (paperback) | ||
| 040 |
_aUkCbUP _beng _erda _cUkCbUP |
||
| 043 | _ae------ | ||
| 049 | _aAlfaisal Main Library | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 |
_aKJE5461 _b.J325 2014 |
| 082 | 0 | 0 |
_a341.242/2284 _223 |
| 100 | 1 |
_aJacob, Marc A., _d1979- _eauthor. |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aPrecedents and case-based reasoning in the European Court of Justice : _bunfinished business / _cMarc Jacob. |
| 246 | 3 | _aPrecedents & Case-Based Reasoning in the European Court of Justice | |
| 264 | 1 |
_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2014. |
|
| 300 |
_a1 online resource (xv, 339 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s). |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 500 | _aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). | ||
| 505 | 0 | _aIntroduction -- Setting precedents : law made in Luxembourg -- Determining the essence of ECJ precedents -- Precedent application by the ECJ -- Avoiding ECJ precedents I : distinguishing -- Avoiding ECJ precedents II : departing -- ECJ precedents incontext -- The normativity of ECJ precedents -- Conclusions and suggestions. | |
| 520 | _aPast cases are the European Court of Justice's most prominent tool in making and justifying the rulings and decisions which affect the everyday lives of more than half a billion people. Marc Jacob's detailed analysis of the use of precedents and case-based reasoning in the Court uses methods such as doctrinal scholarship, empirical research, institutional analysis, comparative law and legal theory in order to unravel and critique the how and why of the Court's precedent technique. In doing so, he moves the wider debate beyond received 'common law' versus 'civil law' figments and 'Eurosceptic' versus 'Euromantic' battle lines, and also provides a useful blueprint for assessing and comparing the case law practices of other dispute resolution bodies. | ||
| 610 | 2 | 0 | _aCourt of Justice of the European Communities. |
| 650 | 0 |
_aStare decisis _zEuropean Union countries. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aCase-based reasoning _zEuropean Union countries. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aJudgments _zEuropean Union countries. |
|
| 655 | 7 |
_aElectronic books. _2local |
|
| 710 | 2 | _aCambridge eBooks. | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _z9781107045491 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttp://ezproxy.alfaisal.edu/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107053762 |
| 942 |
_2lcc _cEBOOKS |
||
| 999 |
_c317319 _d317319 |
||