| 000 | 02675cam a2200397 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | rnd000000000047791 | ||
| 003 | RAND | ||
| 008 | 920212s1990 caua b 000 0 eng d | ||
| 010 | _a 91126826 | ||
| 020 | _a0833010972 | ||
| 027 | _aRAND/R-3996-RC | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) a189014 | ||
| 037 | _c$25.00 | ||
| 040 |
_aCstmoR _cCstmoR |
||
| 043 | _an-us--- | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 |
_aUC263 _b.B57 1990 |
| 100 | 1 |
_aBirkler, J. L., _d1944- _eauthor. |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aIssues associated with second-source procurement decisions / _cJ.L. Birkler, E. Dews, J.P. Large. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aSanta Monica, CA : _bRAND, _c1990. |
|
| 300 |
_axv, 67 pages : _billustrations ; _c23 cm |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
| 500 | _a"December 1990." | ||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references. | ||
| 520 | _aThe basic argument for competition in Department of Defense (DoD) procurement is that it is believed to reduce the government's cost of purchasing goods and services. Nonetheless, in some cases it may be actually less costly for the government to forgo competition and rely on a single supplier. The DoD's program manager must determine whether competition is likely to result in savings or losses for the government; if competition is indicated, he must then decide on what specific form it should take. This report focuses on one of the DOD's strategies for establishing competitive production sources--"second-source" procurement, in which two firms produce a single design. Such an arrangement does not meet the requirements of traditional economic theory for the forces of competition to operate with full effectiveness. Only one buyer and only two sellers exist; demand is inelastic but uncertain. The authors describe five methods of estimating single-source cost, analyze the effect of competition, and discuss the breakeven method, which deduces the magnitude of pure savings needed to compensate for the cost to the government of introducing a second source. Finally, they analyze the Tomahawk project as an example of second-source procurement, and consider the quality of the resulting product. | ||
| 530 | _aAlso available on the internet via WWW in PDF format. | ||
| 588 | _aDescription based on print version record. | ||
| 651 | 0 |
_aUnited States _xArmed Forces _xProcurement. |
|
| 651 | 0 |
_aUnited States _xArmed Forces _xWeapons systems. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aDews, Edmund, _d1921- _eauthor. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aLarge, Joseph P. _eauthor. |
|
| 710 | 2 | _aRand Corporation. | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 |
_yOnline Access _uhttp://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3996/ |
| 999 |
_c598654 _d598654 |
||