000 | 02009nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | US-DLC | ||
005 | 20250420055141.0 | ||
008 | 250420b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a9781577666707 | ||
040 |
_aau _beng _cau |
||
049 | _aAlfaisal Main Library | ||
050 |
_aJZ1242 _b.W35 2019 |
||
245 |
_a Theory of international politics _cAuthor: Kenneth N. Waltz |
||
260 | _c2019 | ||
264 |
_aLong Grove, Ill. _bWaveland Press, _c2019 |
||
300 | _a251 pages | ||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
520 | _aFrom Theory of International Politics . . . "National politics is the realm of authority, of administration, and of law. International politics is the realm of power, of struggle, and of accommodation. . . . States, like people, are insecure in proportion to the extent of their freedom. If freedom is wanted, insecurity must be accepted. Organizations that establish relations of authority and control may increase security as they decrease freedom. If might does not make right, whether among people or states, then some institution or agency has intervened to lift them out of nature's realm. The more influential the agency, the stronger the desire to control it becomes. In contrast, units in an anarchic order act for their own sakes and not for the sake of preserving an organization and furthering their fortunes within it. Force is used for one's own interest. In the absence of organization, people or states are free to leave one another alone. Even when they do not do so, they are better able, in the absence of the politics of the organization, to concentrate on the politics of the problem and to aim for a minimum agreement that will permit their separate existence rather than a maximum agreement for the sake of maintaining unity. If might decides, then bloody struggles over right can more easily be avoided." -- Publisher | ||
655 | 0 |
_aPrint books. _2local _94 |
|
942 |
_2lcc _cBOOKS |
||
999 |
_c604107 _d604107 |